davidians

Or even just the Branch Davidians and the seventh day adventists, of whom the branch Davidians were an offshoot.

The articles covering this topic all seem intent on painting Bridgewater as the Branch Davidians of Wall St.

Audio recorded by the milk-carton bugs suggests the Davidians started the fires, acting on orders from Koresh.

Go ask the Weather Underground or the Branch Davidians what happens when you have guns and think you can challenge the government.

Yes the branch Davidians were stockpiling weapons but at that point they were, to my understanding, legally allowed to own and sell guns.

Where is the evidence that the Davidians started the fire?

The group is still indeed a nutty cult and while the gas used may contribute to a fire, there was evidence that the Davidians did start the fire, whether or not the gas helped it grow.

Certainly, I do not come out thinking Koresh's Branch Davidians were the victims.

I've yet to see any evidence that the Branch Davidians had committed crimes that the ATF had enough evidence for to effect arrests.

Whether the fire was accidentally started by the tear-gas or set by the Branch Davidians themselves isn't actually all that important in deciding if they're a wacky cult or not.

I thought the branch davidians fired first.

I'm not going to break down the semantics, but I'd say there's a bit of a gap between, say, The Methodist Church and the Branch Davidians or the Peoples Temple.

True, but the NRA was powerful before Ruby Ridge or the Davidians.

The only thing she smoked were the Branch Davidians.

They basically lost 20:1 versus the Davidians.