consumptive

Cutting across a yard or walking into a store is still trespass, even though it's only consumptive/rivalrous in a de minimis way.

Expenditures that are non-consumptive should be excluded from taxable income because they don't represent an increase in wealth.

They would still be consuming in our society and their non-consumptive actions would still have economic effects.

At least for anything less trivial that a richer consumptive experience (no offense intended to anyone in the multimedia industry).

Empower,not just encourage, other individuals to be creative rather than consumptive, thus generating freedom and accountability.

There are compelling arguments that consumptive taxes would be more efficient, but efficiency isn't the only policy concern in play.

But there are matters of degree and quality, different aspects, etc., and the passive/consumptive/based-on-purchase aspects of culture are worth critical attention.

In other words, landscaping is a consumptive activity, not a productive one (and that's fine).

Workers should, similarly, be able to deduct the expenses that have no consumptive value to them other than enabling them to work.

There's plenty to go around if we all don't try to live the heavily over-consumptive lives of middle-class Americans...

An attacker could still choose the moment-when-content-goes-bad; in the envisioned use of immediately-executing the verifier output, this might leave things in a problematic/resource-consumptive state.

A lot of people, if given money, 1) promptly quit their jobs and 2) promptly fill their empty hours with consumptive activities, not productive ones.

I mostly just feel annoyed that I'm not getting something accomplished, whether that "something" is actively creative or passively consumptive (as much as something passively consumptive can be "accomplished").

It’s been flood-irrigated in the past, but we’re switching it all to micro-sprinkler.” Doing that will reduce Cox’s water need, but it will also have the perverse efficiency effect that Bradley Udall described, by turning a non-consumptive use (irrigation runoff) into a consumptive one (more grapefruit).

DropBox and in this case, the strategy — while amazingly cash consumptive — does make sense." 5 years from now, I do see a possibility that Box is doing very well in enterprise, and Dropbox gets squeezed hard in the fiercely competitive consumer/SMB space.

(My computers are constantly communicating with other computers while I sleep!) Consumptive/rivalrous use is relevant to the issue of what words, analogies, and legal regime should apply.