constructions

I'll go ahead and assert that both of those constructions mean the same thing.

Don't you show that for specific constructions you can make LEM work for classical proofs with continuation monads?

One possibility is rewriting recursive constructions to imperative loops in a pass prior to trace selection.

Your language will be full of tortured constructions that are (hopefully) grammatically legal but idiomatically terrible.

While they look nice (and structurally sound), people still prefer the traditional house constructions.

It might still be possible to use series/parallel constructions to cancel out the 5 and still save resistors vs' some other numbering scheme.

In spite of their common development, drawing soon falls behind the mental conception of space (especially in the case of complex and three-dimensional constructions).

So many debates in tech circles come from these mathematical constructions set out to prove someone's idea isn't perfect or they are doing it wrong.

If you use nonstandard constructions, fewer people will understand you.

I can't help feeling there is some kind of essential life force in such constructions, in the spaces between order and randomness.

Two that jump immediately to mind: * Constructions like CTR need to divide the block, in CTR's case to hold both a counter and a nonce.

More to the point, Mathematical Logic is a bit of a term of art referring in general to the study of formal logical systems and related objects/constructions.

Worse, their proofs on "secure" constructions sometimes don't even apply to the real protocol rather than an abstraction of it lacking key details (eg padding).

Our social constructions heavily influence how "Men and women, on average, differ significantly on career choice, likes, dislikes, and motivation," (from grandparent comment).

The remainder tend to be caused by odd combinations of features we didn't think of (which more often than not tend to be constructions with simple, working equivalents), often they become a question of "do we want to support this or not".

> for instance spy agencies spying on their own citizens is more broadly recognized as bad) An instance of the more general value of "personal privacy" which has nothing to do with such abstract constructions as "nations".