chaining

Game should probably be made a little easier so the intended strategy of chaining primes becomes more viable.

Randomly chaining numbers seems to be the most practical strategy up until you start running into the empty blocks.

I've had PoCs of algorithms sent to me in Excel because the graphical chaining of each step is so illustrative.

A decent strategy seems to be: start chaining a long path together.

If you're chaining Promises, again, generics can cover their return/param types.

Some people use it for chaining up the optional type.

All of computation can be expressed as function chaining.

As much as I hate chaining functions, I do like the idiom of declaring that a function may panic with the 'Must' prefix.

I usually prefer the chaining method extensions for collections myself...

And that child daisy-chaining since afternoon.

I'd think it would return the original promise, for chaining.

> More to the point, compared to the case of for loops vs `map`, the use case for this kind of function chaining doesn't appear all that often Function chaining appears quite a bit in my Haskell code.

"the use case for this kind of function chaining doesn't appear all that often" Or it does, and you miss it.

But i'll warn you, i've been nicely flummoxed by competing 'simple' explanations in this forum previously: "A Monad is an object whose methods return monads.", "They're simply a highly specific way of chaining operations together.", "You know how jQuery methods can string out multiple methods with periods?