cataclysmic

Maybe not the best decision in hindsight, but far from this cataclysmic fantasy you seem to be depicting.

However, being on Mars would allows us to re colonize Earth N years after a cataclysmic event.

These cataclysmic events have occurred before in history, and they will happen again in the future.

These events would seem rather cataclysmic for our universe as a whole, but that could be chalked up to our limited understanding.

This seems like a classic example of our tendency to overestimate the importance of singular, cataclysmic impacts, as opposed to predictable, systemic ones.

If it's done during a period when the private sector is also shrinking its spending, the effect on employment and growth can be cataclysmic.

Everything is explicit, the only surprises are panics which are cataclysmic anyhow.

The only reason we didn't hear about these cataclysmic exploits is because it wasn't Flash.

I find it hard to believe we're at all prepared for potential cataclysmic situations.

And it is, in laymen's terms, utterly cataclysmic.

We're looking at cataclysmic changes in the oceans.

This disparity will cause cataclysmic clashes.

But I think we use the word "perish" to mean some sort of cataclysmic end.

The effects of making this change, the "experts" and politicians said, would be cataclysmic.

Of course, asking for proof that we're "prepared for potential cataclysmic situations" is the mother of all goalpost maneuvers.

And that's sorta why we get entertained with cataclysmic scifi themes, because it gives a "no choice" instigator for that asset destruction.