carpet

Doing such a thing will help them much more in the longer term than trying to simply sweep this story under the carpet.

You don't want to be damping the precious sound waves with carpet or plasterboard. I wish I was joking.

When he finished his hot dog, he threw the messy wrapper directly onto the carpet. It was not a missed shot at the trash can, it was just blithely dropped on the floor.

Your chances of getting the same red carpet treatment from the Feds are effectively zero. Hire a lawyer.

I feel like it's time to carpet-bomb management and B-schools with PeopleWare again. A few years ago I did a 3-week internship in the consulting arm of a Big 4 accounting firm.

But you -- you are just another male nerd, and you have apparently had a red carpet laid out for you to the world of coding, so you must be privileged. There are tons of jobs that are female dominated.

* Staff at the Naval Academy, Annapolis: more desk acreage than I could use, huge vaulted window, rich blue carpet, could hide out all day. Productivity: 0-8.

Time for the Executive to step-up, fire a bunch of high-rankers and NOT sweep this under the carpet as some sort of "Bad Apples" or "Mistakes were Made" whitewash. Otherwise all that Hope & Change sloganeering will be empty rhetoric.

What is most important is this: the guy who made a comment directly to her about looking under a [table] skirt and finding it "bare, just the way [he] liked it" DID NOT have a picture posted to Twitter and a massive call-to-the-carpet moment. She talked to him.

Honestly, I don't think this was a 'security hole', more like a digital equivalent of a home owner hiding house keys under the carpet, hoping no one will look.

This is bothersome as I have no beef with Tesla but his history of eugenics promotion gets swept under the carpet. His business failures, of course, have nothing to do with poorly thought out concepts and questionable return on investment, but by dirty tricks by Edison.

While hill staffers and other washington movers and shakers were being carpet bombed two years ago during budget negotiations, it was really eye opening how much individual effort was put forth. They were exploiting a flash 0-day that was embedded in various .

The real question will be if all of the other Senators vote for cloture just to get the issue swept back under the carpet. Impediments on the power of government aren't particularly popular to those who wield the power of government, regardless of the branch they occupy.

They do roll out the red carpet treatment in the early days for people that a manager insists need it. But they operate on stack ranking, are completely political, anti-innovation, and really they are very much like a cult, with their own reality distortion field and magical sayings."

I have experienced the blunt, raw force of their emotional carpet bombing firsthand from a certain family member. Everyone needs to remember that these people are hardwired to be deliberately manipulative, because they feel good only when you're giving them attention.

Second, the whole "Rodrigo and Gabriella" example is not only contrived to support a flawed argument, it also features several inconsistencies that it conveniently sweeps under the carpet. For example, Gabriella is said to be "able to explain complex technical issues quite clearly to clients", yet "she doesn't really grasp the concept of writing code that performs well".

In my opinion, this individual's statement makes them sound like a self-aggrandizing, grade-A asshole -- the prosecutorial equivalent of an ambulance chaser with a low-def ad on late night TV and a strip-mall office that smells like moldy carpet.

And so, the democratisation of medicine, which is empowering for patients, and a good thing, creates distortions in the marketplace, as the uninformed but impressionable patients make treatment decisions based on emotional appeals about 'holistic therapies' that are less toxic - but also, and what is swept under the carpet, less effective. Disclosure: Final year medical student

Interesting to see that she sweeps under the carpet things like Apple filing patent lawsuits against Android phones, and Jobs insinuating that Android is for porn. I sometimes feel that she plays to her primarily anti-MS audience, especially to keep things interesting to them after the SCO case ran out of gas but at the same time cannot criticize Apple too much even if deserved since that would anger the pro-Apple portion of the crowd.

She told her wise men to come up with a plan to cover the world in a lush carpet. The wise men pondered and said that this could not be done. The princess threw a fit. The wise men pondered some more. Then they said "Princess, we can not cover the world in a large carpet, but we can, however, cover your feet in a small one".