bruker

Vi bruker for eksempel kun 100% norsk storfekjøtt, kun norske økologiske egg og norske poteter – og når sesongen tillater det, bruker vi norsk salat, tomat og løk.

The Bruker solution (also Open Source and free, by the by) does this admirably well.

Also, the new Bruker systems run at 28.2 T, which is a mind-bogglingly large field.

Why did you use a bruker NMR instead of a varian NMR?

(and one more from Bruker which is so old that they don't show it on their website anymore).

The Bruker machine I use can do ~15 cm diameter samples at ~40 um voxel size, so that’s something that should be possible with any machines.

We've reached diminishing returns here I think but from the article linked he worked successively as Director of R&D in imaging at Bruker and Siemens, directing product development in the imaging detectors.

The latest Bruker TOF quadrupole ion trap mass spec is able to sample (tens of?) thousands of ion or m/z datapoints per minute with an optional electrospray ionizer that can handle 100s of kilodaltons so that’s no longer the bottleneck for most proteomics.

So this isn't an amateur programmer, it's a person who got a phd in nuclear engineering and radiological sciences, was a scientist at bruker, has some experience with health systems, and then became a serial entrepeneur with a small company that has some funding.

A radiologist's eye can do the same, and unless I see compelling evidence that the AI can do it better, something I have not seen, yet, any of the now 30+ solutions for AI analysis (as I said, Bruker and others are also offering theirs for free and open, and behind them stand massive research apparatuses) should especially not be used in developing countries.

He wasn't a "director" at Bruker, he was a "detector imaging scientist".

Greit nok, men da har man likevel en stor del av vinduet dekket av "Google Translate", i tillegg til de gigantiske bildene som norske nettaviser typisk bruker, før man kommer til artikkelen.

I read the entire article and I didn't see anything in there that would convince me this author is anything other than an amateur programmer (I can't parse the section about bruker- is the "amateur programmer" also a director at Bruker who ddevelops medical devices full-time"?).

The checkbox for the sharing of this, non-image, non-personally identifiable, data with the company (Siemens, Bruker, etc.) is hidden behind a "I have ethics committee review and here's the decision's file number and date" request.

And so far the only spectrometer I know of where they are used is the still extremely new 1.2 GHz Bruker.

We've had preclinical 12T and way above machines for a while now (Bruker will sell you a ~21T, 1 GHz Larmour frequency machine, for instance).

When I used NMR scientific instruments that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in the 1990s, the Japanese (Jeol) machines had a far more straightforward interface than the German (Bruker) machines.