bridled

All while bridled (C-style) gotos were considered acceptable by Dijstrka, but are now looked upon with disdain.

Maybe the solution is bridled (constrained) capitalism?

Depending on the measure [0], it's possible that the richest billionaires and least-bridled corporations are both well in the past.

While I think we can agree that return is go to, it is a bridled go to.

I would dare say that even our own press is somewhat more bridled now then ever.

Not using web services has less to do with being bridled corporate restrictions and more to do with preferring to use our nice, fully automated infrastructure.

I think we all agree with Dijkstra that, in his words, unbridled gotos are harmful, but C's goto is most definitely bridled.

In fact many have good arguments that it's far too bridled in terms of tariffs and import quotas and price controls and so on and so forth.

GitHub:FI was really built with large customers in mind, places with tens to hundreds of developers bridled with restrictions that prevent them from hosting their code on GitHub.com.

They are strictly bridled in the execution scope.

You seem to imply customers demand bridled CPUs.

From what I have seen, rich environments have plenty of bridled stressors, and these rich kids are developing plenty thick skin, just with adequate supervision.

There definitely are major customers (for example, cloud providers) which explicitly demanded "bridled CPUs" like TPM and SecureBoot.

As mentioned in the "Go To Statement Considered Harmful" paper, goto is good as long as it is bridled.

> cloud providers) which explicitly demanded "bridled CPUs" like TPM and SecureBoot You seem to be terribly confused.

Reading around the web an hour ago, looking for confirmation of the then-minutes-old news that Jesus had resigned as prince of the apostles, I repeatedly encountered and bridled each time at use of the adjective “shocking” to describe the announcement.

Bridled, so that it doesn’t suffer the problems Dijkstra spoke of?