breyer

In 2010 alone, 7 of the judges were the lone dissenter at least once: Breyer - Milner v.

If that's an accurate summation, Breyer is describing an effect and asking us to assume it's desirable.

If a Republican president wins, it's possible that Breyer (who leans left) will outlast him.

You are double counting Breyer and Accel's shares -- footnotes give the key details.

After all, come 2016 Breyer will be 77, Kennedy will be 79, Scalia will be 80, and Ginsburg will be 83.

So collectively, Breyer is considered to control 30% of voting shares.

Roberts and Breyer being an exception, and slightly less predictable.

Justice Breyer gets particularly snarky during oral argument.

What Justice Breyer has effectively argued is that the sort of activity that Aereo is engaging in was clearly the sort of activity that Congress was seeking to legislate in the Copyright Act of 1976.

But if the Democrats take the White House and Breyer and Gisnburg retire before 2024 (likely in both cases), then both Kennedy and Scalia will also need to hold out until 2024 just to preserve the 4-4-1 status quo.

There really is no other way to read that case, and despite technical differences between Ginsberg (really, really bad) and Breyer (really, really good), all 9 justices on the court agreed with that basic idea.

Its manager James Breyer was formerly chairman of the National Venture Capital Association, and served on the board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, a venture capital firm established by the Central Intelligence Agency in 1999.

Breyer replied: "I don't either because I can never get into it because of the password."

Reading the majority opinion and Breyer's dissent ("collective good should overrule free speech"), I'm inclined to agree with majority as in the current political climate the alternative is much scarier.

In a legal context, Stephen Breyer makes a similar argument about the decisionmaking process of self-professed “originalists” and “textualists” on the Supreme Court.

("According to Justice Breyer’s concurrence, joined by Justices Scalia and Alito, the presumption of validity only provides protection against factual elements of an invalidity challenge.

There's a interesting essay by Stephen Breyer, from before he became a Supreme Court justice, that comes to the opposite conclusion.

Breyer personally owns 3%, and is deemed to control Accel's 27%.

Breyer's being one of their non-premium brands, it's one of the few they have that's so price sensitive that they'd risk so blatantly using filler substitutes.