Breeches used in a sentence

Breeches in a sentence as a noun

Have there been many security breeches from the police/courts? Is this a large threat to personal security?

Target and Home Depot didn't take any hit to their stock prices being the two biggest data breeches in a row. At worst, it registers as a minor inconvenience.

Lets face it, any large structural breakup that breeches the tanks of a hypergolic fuel is going to cause a huge explosion regardless.

Try to avoid the urge to pick it apart on a literal basis and focus on how this breeches basic social contracts. Then consider that normal people work at Flickr, and that those people are trying to do something good for users.

I suspect that heartbleed was the current use case, but this service will be very helpful for future breeches and issues. For example they could alert you that XYZ Service had a data breech, it's fixed, and you should rotate your password.

Two breeches with a lack of communication really does spoil overnight the trust that has been built up over years of wonderful and reliable service.

He presided over some of the worst breeches of data privacy in contemporary political history, how exactly does he expect anyone to trust him? Would he have made these bold statements, had he not have been found out?

Com needs a new proof-reader, or I'd like to order a pair of "increasingly large security breeches", they sound hilariously comfortable. Although I might not be allowed on an airplane wearing them.

The goal is to prevent interception and or data breeches on a lost laptop, not to hide the information from everyone. The same backdoor exits with full disk encryption so internal IT can help users who forgot their password etc.

Makes my vulnerability scanning a little more time consuming, but frees up time I would otherwise be spending on documenting security breeches and data loss. Kudos.

In general, in the numerous discussions I've read so far, people are much more focused on this breech itself, not on the root causes nor how to prevent these types of breeches in the future.

Do they believe they can secure against the potential universal data breeches, or do they have some overriding ulterior motive that allows them to accept the risk?

You can get away with serious customer service breeches in the government because the possible recourses are so few and costly. Look at the Department of Interior "oversight" of grazing land owned by Native Americans.

Google was being investigated for what were basically accidental breeches of privacy, not for anything that was actively malicious.

There is evidence of far more significant data breeches nearly every day in the press - Byzantine Hades, RSA, Aurora, Night dragon, the list goes on and on. Probably the best argument for why this specific sql database with web app passwords hasn't been compromised in the past is that it's of very questionable value.

If culturally we can get to a point where the world denounces privacy breeches and technologically we advance tools to easily expose these breeches, can't we establish some privacy standards and keep them in check? We don't need perfection, we just need to make the cost of privacy breeches high enough and risky enough to create a meaningfull disincentive.

But what I came away from it thinking was about how much money is spent by state security institutions to prevent this sort of thing, and yet secrecy breeches at scale are the Walkers, Mannings, and Snowdens using USB sticks and DVD's and copiers.

For example, data breeches are a known risk, and can be planned for by designing the system to reduce the impact of the risk, by setting aside funds in order to handle litigation which might arise, and by purchasing insurance coverage should those funds prove insufficient. These make operations more expensive for the company, certainly, while a TOS which waives federal data protections is cheap.

For example, Rails may be more productive than J2EE up front, but if you lose significant developer time or worse, money, to breeches and exploits, then its total productivity could end up worse than J2EE. I'm only saying this hypothetically b/c I don't have any data on that, but I see this sentiment over and over, that Rails is the most productive framework out there. But the question to ask is what is the real expected value of Rails productivity vs other frameworks.

There needs to be a set of concrete examples of how these information breeches actually hurt real people. Saying, "their privacy has been violated in a pretty drastic manner leading to death, identity theft or embarrassment" isn't specific enough, and as a reader, I don't buy that the Nazis are going to take over in America someday so they can eradicate all the Jews in the employment of the United States government.

If you read about what was actually shared, though, "tips about forthcoming trades, details of confidential client business and discussions of stop-losses", it sounds like there may have been some serious breeches of fiduciary duty on the part of the people providing the information.