bluster

There's a lot of bluster in the rest of your response.

You don't need to bluster or make emotional pleas.

Well, ok. No one worth taking the time to talk to would ever make that assertion, so it seems like wasted bluster.

The entire matter reeks of nothing but bluster by a control freak overseeing a witch hunt.

Just bluster and theater in preparation for the next presidential race?I don't care.

This is all bluster for a a 1983 lawsuit, however, ....The 1983 lawsuit is probably a non-starter on the 4th amendment side.

It's only going to go downhill from here... with a lot of bluster and paranoia from Arrington against all threats, real or perceived.

You might be surprised how often bad hires end up not having any real references at all, and just bluster their way through that part of the interview.

No bluster about how it must have happened because they're so awesome and made such brilliant calculated decisions.

Totally agree, I've lost track of the number of people I've had to deal with who try to mask their lack of competence in an area with bluster, bravado, and bullshit.

I am an incredibly articulate person your honor, but the nature of the internet is one of bluster, and bravado, and scathing comebacks.

If you catch someone with narcissistic personality disorder in a lie or situation where they've hurt someone and call them out on it, the response is usually bluster, a frantic attempt to shore up ego. If you catch someone with borderline personality disorder or just plain deep insecurity, they'll often deflate and get downcast.

Having been involved in a number of these situations on the other side, usually they are just bluster, basically a warning that "if he works on something competitive, we will come after you", or a warning shot to stop poaching.

Maybe the kind of dumb lockerroom overshare bluster amongst the employees and managers of sexually harassing companies and departments lends itself to admitting incriminating things like that to other men with a wink wink nudge nudge.

Despite all the accusations and bluster at the beginning, the indictment alleges three things:1. Violation of 18 USC 1956[1] - knowingly laundering money; 2. Violation of 18 USC 1960[2] - conspiring to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business; 3. Violation of 18 USC[3] - operating an unlicensed money transmitting business - 18 USC 1960 and 31 USC 5330This is what distinguishes legitimate bitcoin dealers like coinbase from Liberty Reserve.