baez

The primary one in recent decades was Loop Quantum Gravity, and the related Spin Foams that my friend John Baez worked on for many years.

> John Baez is no longer enthusiastic about working on quantum gravity.

Baez has earned more credibility than to be written off with a vulgar thoughtless one-liner.

One of the authors, John Baez, has been blogging since before the concept existed.

I love Baez's writing so I'm pretty eager to run through this as well.

Anyway, people are better off looking at the paper itself (which is rather sober) than reading Baez's summary, as the two are about the same length.

One of the authors, Baez, wrote "Gauge Fields, Knots, and Gravity" a lovely, cheap, and fairly accessible intro to applications of topology in mathematical physics.

Goransson's paper that he links too at least states that it's about a "nonstandard parameterisation," as opposed to talking about how it's another form of time (hey Baez, I suppose you could explain MPH to people as being another form of time if your goal was to confuse rather than enlighten).

One of the authors, Baez, wrote "Gauge Fields, Knots, and Gravity" a lovely, cheap, and fairly accessible intro to applications of topology in mathematical physics.

Goransson's paper that he links too at least states that it's about a "nonstandard parameterisation," as opposed to talking about how it's another form of time (hey Baez, I suppose you could explain MPH to people as being another form of time if your goal was to confuse rather than enlighten).

Baez has earned more credibility than to be written off with a vulgar thoughtless one-liner.

One of the authors, John Baez, has been blogging since before the concept existed.

I love Baez's writing so I'm pretty eager to run through this as well.