astrologers

Any number of astrologers will independently confirm the accounts of other astrologers, and Bigfoot investigators back each other up all the time.

Asking scientists who specialize in Spearman's g whether g is real is like asking astrologers whether astrology works.

If this were not so, astrologers -- who do lots of observing and describing -- would be scientists.

Extending your argument about 2 viewpoints: lets go listen to what astrologers have to say about criticism from astronomers...

In the 3rd act he is captured and thrown back in chains - the astrologers' prediction has been fulfilled.

Sometimes it seems like astrologers and palm readers arguing over which technique happened to randomly seem to work last time.

It's not for fringe kooks A much larger percentage of CEOs, CTOs, D of E's depend on psychics and astrologers.

Ahhh, but what if the stars foretold the burning car and directed the astrologers attention to the right time and place?

Yes, and there are a lot of people who have been helped by astrologers.

Well, you can, but then your beliefs have no more backing than those of astrologers, and you're guilty of willfully spreading misinformation.

It is customary to announce the fact so that the astrologers can proclaim that the population of recruiters on linkedin has increased.

The reason Astrologers are not scientists is not that they don't try to work out why the positions of planets might affect the future.

(But yeah, I personally don't buy into all this and consider astrologers who charge money for any "divine interpretation" as scammers).

Astrologers believe in something you don't, and it's very ignorant to say they're deficient in basic mental processes.

Astrologers would love for me to do that, as would psychologists.

Hippies and Astrologers, just like any Scientist is left-hemisphere dominant if they're right handed, it doesn't change and you cannot do anything that affects it (aside from maybe a stroke).