anti-death

This thread is full of people who are anti-death penalty who don't think some guy should be executed.

First, the overlap between the anti-aging and anti-death community and the effective altruism community is pretty large.

If the executioner did their work in the anti-death-sentence state it wouldn't seem to be absurd, no.

I mean it would be absurd if an anti-death-sentence state started trying to extradite the executioners working in pro-death-sentence states for murder, right?

If Greece is anti-death penalty and there would be a chance of that, they would not extradite.

An anti-death-penalty advocate might have a long list of logically sound reasons for their belief (e.g.

To your point there are plenty of competing religious teachings that could lead some to be pro-choice, pro-welfare and anti-death penalty.

I think there is no such thing as an anti-car agenda, but perhaps there is an anti-death one.

The Catholic Church today is generally anti-death-penalty and anti-war, yet these Papal opinions do not seem to trickle down to the laity either.

Excuse me, I'm as anti-death as anyone else, but I'm going to laugh bitterly now.

Take it from someone who went to medical school: you'd be hard-pressed to find people with an anti-aging/anti-death stance among a random sample of medical professionals.

> This thread is full of people who are anti-death penalty Who even argues in favor of it?

Those "anti-death" ideologists are just kooks trying whatever fringe BS they find (including "cryogenics"), and they do more harm than good regading helping good science...

Anti-death technology sounds really similar.