anita

The issue is will this result in Anita Sarkeesian being mass-flagged and automatically banned?

So, yes, you don't have to fear mass-flagging and people sending Anita Sarkeesian rape threats will be mass-flagged and removed.

It reminds me of another lady, Anita Sarkeesian, who also received death threats.

I clicked on comments and were absolutely shocked that noone mentioned Anita Sarkeesian.

However, Anita and her ilk feed on outrage.

We could look at people like Brianna Wu and Anita Sarkeesian, who I feel confident we'll agree have experienced massive and credible death threats.

For example suppose I were to criticize Zoe Quinn or Anita Sarkeesian.

While searching to find that, I came across this interesting article thoroughly smacking down Feminist Frequency's Jonathan McIntosh and Anita Sarkeesian's complaints about the game: [2].

I don't think it's fair to equate the barrage of foul insults Anita is receiving, with her simply saying: look at what I have to put up with.

> There have been countless detailed refutations that dismantle pretty much every argument Anita Sarkeesian has put forth Does anyone have a link to such a refutation?

Look at the level of hatred directed towards Hilary Clinton or Barack Obama; look at the hatred directed towards a woman trying to present at a tech conference; look at the death threats Anita Sarkeesian has received for making YouTube videos on video games.

And when you show these guys incontrovertible evidence that the accusation against Quinn was a lie, then they immediately backpedal and say it was never really about Quinn, and go right back to raging about Anita Sarkeesian and Brianna Wu and ignoring guys like Gerstmann.

If Randi, Anita, and Brianna weren't anonymous but they were "doxed" it seems to me that "doxing" doesn't have to refer to revealing info of an anonymous person.

"I don't want Danny to come and see Anita Sarkesian talk because he is a man and his being there will be a buzzkill".

The greatest tragedy here is that there's whole lot of people with binary perception amounting to "with us or against us" who can't tolerate the tought that there may be valid points raised by other side, and thus dismissing (or more often flaming) either Adrian Chmielarz or Anita Sarkesian voices simply because they are on wrong side.

Anita Sarkeesian's kickstarter to expose male privilege in video games brought in over $150k, originally it was for under $10k but over time she's been able to monetize her victimization in the sense that the more she's "victimized" the more her supporters give to her so she can continue fighting the power.

So you're saying GamerGate proceeded to dox someone it didn't like and gave that person's info to Anita?

Anita, by contrast, is more notable for the buzz and backlash she generated than any of her actual work.

In brief spurts maybe, especially if they dare to support someone like Anita, but sustained like this?