Affirmation used in a sentence

Affirmation in a sentence as a noun

Maybe Steves expectations were far to high, or he come here looking for positive affirmation.

Its not an affirmation of the supremacy of iOS as a publishing platform or a subtle diss at Android.

What's the point of submitting stories when you know it will get flagged and censored?A culture of censorship and self-affirmation.

Vs. > The right of the people to be secure in their persons, > houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches > and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall > issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or > affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be > searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Even apparently meaningless suffering, he said, can be made meaningful depending on your response: you can maintain your human dignity in the face of overwhelming suffering, and by not forgetting yourself, you can be an affirmation of the strength of humankind.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

>"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

" Hm, let's see:"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

One paragraph explaining the legal requirement for probable cause and a specific search warrant:- "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

I don’t believe someone who acts to subvert the Bill of Rights which states“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”is even remotely close to being a patriot.> Many are concerned about the NSA listening to their phone calls and reading their email messages.