abiogenic

It might be a neologism but im using it in the sense of biogenic and abiogenic mineral creation.

Now the real point: in the 50s soviet scientists had the idea that abiogenic oil could exist, then found some.

There are theories that at least some oil is abiogenic, which would make oil the same kind of fossil as uranium is.

The amount of naturally-occurring abiogenic oil is quite possibly non-zero, but clearly accounts for at most a tiny fraction of all naturally-occurring oil.

That's not as easy as it sounds, since we're always discovering new abiogenic processes that make even complex hydrocarbons.

Oh, and abiogenic petroleum is pretty much crackpottery, so that doesn't help.

We're still working out how to identify abiogenic stromatolites from biogenic ones.

I meant if there is petroleum oil in Mars or Venus, it makes the abiogenic petroleum oil more possible be universal resources.

It make the abiogenic petroleum oil more possible be universal.

Even if abiogenic oil theory were true, we would still be experiencing peak oil.

Ever heard of the abiogenic petroleum hypothesis?

Mixed chirality implies a mundane abiogenic origin.

Abiogenic synthesis of "primordial soup" is fairly straight forward, see the Miller-Urey Experiment.

For example: "Then the site jumps into other crackpot ideas, like Tom Gold’s abiogenic origin of petroleum (long ago falsified), and presents a list of 19th century naturalists who talked about dinosaurs because they allegedly made up their discoveries in order to promote evolution!

Abiogenic petroleum formation has effectively no empirical support.

Abiogenic origin of oil in the Earth's crust.