100001

100001 You could takeout the >: but then the range is 0 indexed and not 1-based: +/i. 100001

Well, that’s just an extremely large number in binary, exactly the same as the binary string “100001” being “33” in decimal.

Thanks 100011_100001. I always had a positive mental attitude.

Thank you 100011_100001! I got so excited by your response, I figured what the heck and turned my original response into a code-generated, html-driven, svg-drawn comic strip and put in on the front page of my portfolio here: edweissman.

I might not be able to discern between the 1000 and 1001 but there’s no reason I can’t discern between 1001 and 100001. Things can be fuzzy nearby while still being coherent overall.

Dear 100011_100001, in the olden days hacking was not only a job of producing code, there was a hacker culture. There were the gurus, the diciples, and the anarchists.

Is it 100001? strtod also doesn't guarantee round-trip accuracy that you can achieve when you use Steele & White and Clinger.

{ basePhi: '0', n: 0 } { basePhi: '1', n: 1 } { basePhi: '10', n: 2 } { basePhi: '11', n: 3 } { basePhi: '100', n: 4 } { basePhi: '110', n: 5 } { basePhi: '111', n: 6 } { basePhi: '1000', n: 7 } { basePhi: '1001', n: 8 } { basePhi: '1100', n: 9 } { basePhi: '1110', n: 10 } { basePhi: '1111', n: 11 } { basePhi: '10000', n: 12 } { basePhi: '10010', n: 13 } { basePhi: '10011', n: 14 } { basePhi: '11000', n: 15 } { basePhi: '11001', n: 16 } { basePhi: '11100', n: 17 } { basePhi: '11110', n: 18 } { basePhi: '11111', n: 19 } { basePhi: '100000', n: 20 } { basePhi: '100001', n: 21 } { basePhi: '100100', n: 22 } { basePhi: '100110', n: 23 } { basePhi: '100111', n: 24 } { basePhi: '110000', n: 25 } { basePhi: '110010', n: 26 } { basePhi: '110011', n: 27 } { basePhi: '111000', n: 28 } { basePhi: '111001', n: 29 } { basePhi: '111100', n: 30 } { basePhi: '111110', n: 31 } { basePhi: '111111', n: 32 } { basePhi: '1000000', n: 33 } { basePhi: '1000010', n: 34 } { basePhi: '1000011', n: 35 } { basePhi: '1001000', n: 36 } { basePhi: '1001001', n: 37 } { basePhi: '1001100', n: 38 } { basePhi: '1001110', n: 39 } { basePhi: '1001111', n: 40 } { basePhi: '1100000', n: 41 } { basePhi: '1100001', n: 42 } { basePhi: '1100100', n: 43 } { basePhi: '1100110', n: 44 } { basePhi: '1100111', n: 45 } { basePhi: '1110000', n: 46 } { basePhi: '1110010', n: 47 } { basePhi: '1110011', n: 48 } { basePhi: '1111000', n: 49 } { basePhi: '1111001', n: 50 } { basePhi: '1111100', n: 51 } { basePhi: '1111110', n: 52 } { basePhi: '1111111', n: 53 } { basePhi: '10000000', n: 54 } { basePhi: '10000001', n: 55 } { basePhi: '10000100', n: 56 } { basePhi: '10000110', n: 57 } { basePhi: '10000111', n: 58 } { basePhi: '10010000', n: 59 } { basePhi: '10010010', n: 60 } { basePhi: '10010011', n: 61 } { basePhi: '10011000', n: 62 } { basePhi: '10011001', n: 63 } { basePhi: '10011100', n: 64 }

For example if I send my money to an account numbered 100001 but I intended to send it to 1000011, I could argue that I don't know the account holder 100001 and I sent the money by mistake. Classical contract law is a byzantine beast, and it does not take mistakes lightly.

Perhaps your salary changed from 100000/year to 100001/year and those fluctuations are all in the cent range...