Suppressed used in a sentence

Suppressed in a sentence as an adjective

Yes. Just because wages are high does not at all prevent them from being suppressed. There's actually pretty strong evidence that wages are suppressed across the board in tech.

I followed Gruber's advice and suppressed the impulse to switch the defaults back to Snowpard behaviors and find that I'm less happy when I have to use Snowpard now. Meanwhile: * Mail.

But please don't sell me ******** like: "The paradigm was so disruptive that it was suppressed by computer scientists for decades."

"The paradigm was so disruptive that it was suppressed by computer scientists for decades." It didn't really get better from there.

He knowingly participated in a scheme that suppressed the wages of every engineer in the Valley. That should tell you enough.

No. Did anyone really believe that taking a job as a police officer somehow suppressed these people's natural desire to drive fast? ****, that's probably what make them join the force in the first place.

Reactions that involve essentially trying to pretend that technology doesn't exist or can be suppressed will never and have never worked.

Even worse, when moving on to another company, especially a bigCo, their suppressed salary puts them way down at the bottom of the pay scale. It's "diseased" their future salary prospects.

My only grouse is the suppressed political scene, and i am glad that even that is being lifted in a slow but steady manner. and trust me, 90% of my friends have criticized the government in a very public manner on facebook/twitter.

The bone marrow was so suppressed from the medicine she had been religiously taking for the past 18 months, that her body has stopped producing platelets altogether. Backtrack, the medicine she had been taking, was to **** the brain tumor she has lived with all of her life.

I thought that language or cultural barriers prevented those companies from succeeding or that those countries suppressed US companies because they are evil and want to control their population. Today I think I'm more realistic about that.

I listened to everyone who told me that people like that are disgusting freaks, and I tried to keep it suppressed for a long time now, denying it to myself and trying to act "normal," like society expects me to be. Now it's way later and I'm kind of at the end of my rope with long-term clinical depression.

Even for deductive arguments, what if any fallacies are being committed will depend upon how one interprets suppressed premises. The best thing is to learn about different sorts of reasoning and how they work in good cases, and pick up a feel for some fallacies along the way.

As a team converges on a decision, public doubts about the wisdom of the planned move are gradually suppressed and eventually come to be treated as evidence of flawed loyalty. The suppression of doubt contributes to overconfidence in a group where only supporters of the decision have a voice.

The thing that bothers me the most is that this illegal collusion suppressed wages for the entire software industry, robbing us all of money that lined the pockets of these companies. The plaintiffs in this case are by far not the only ones who were affected – Apple, Google, et al. stole tens of thousands of dollars per year from each person who was working in the software industry for the better part of a decade and the vast majority of us aren't going to get any of that back.

A lot of gentrification is happening in areas where historically the residents were suppressed from owning real estate. My own knowledge is mostly around the Portland, Oregon area, but there is a documented history of minorities being unable to purchase property, get loans, and lots of other institutional things that stop people from actually owning the land.

Between refusing to\n consider american candidates, mandatority never ending\n "crunch" time and suppressed wages I can only warn others\n to stay as far away from the companies listed in this\n article as possible, especially if you have an engineering\n degree. \n\n If you don't actually do anything its can be a pretty\n rewarding career assuming you have a knack for abusing\n others...

If there are any victims, they are the people whose true economic potential is being suppressed by the continuing existence of outdated laws. I'm not advocating for an elimination of IP, but I am saying that IP needs to be reformed in a way that will reduce the wealth of companies and individuals who do cling to a pre-internet business model, and it is right to attack them to the extent that a defense of their interests is preventing a modernization of the laws.