walkable

Now the fashion is urban density, and cars are increasingly seen as a blight on walkable downtowns.

This means creating walkable spaces with cycling and public transit prioritized above automobiles.

The next closest walkable bridge between The Bronx and Manhattan, open to pedestrians, is probably at 145th St.

Atlanta is walkable/bikeable if you live in the city, has the 3rd-largest gay population in the U.

They want cozy nooks and nap spaces, walkable commutes, the tastes and conveniences of the city.

The best thing would be living in a city or walkable town with tons of transit and tons of nearby parks.

It's also possible to have urban, walkable neighborhoods where parking isn't extremely difficult or expensive.

Overall it's my impression that urban areas are much more walkable/bikeable than suburban ones.

People want walkable environments with 24/7 activity, not just buildings peppered throughout parking lots.

The cities that have nice walkable urban centers avoided their destruction via highway.

I've never seen such fast-moving traffic on such wide streets in a city ostensibly hailed as walkable.

Old place was close to Whole Foods and walkable to the metro(subway).

They are popular enough in "walkable" parts of the city that some of them are routinely full.

There's also increased demand for "walkable" neighborhoods in suburban areas.

If the waypoint based approach isn't ideal for you, then you should look up "navigation mesh" [1] pathing which is a bit trickier to implement but works well when you have a bunch of large empty/walkable areas.