Unimaginatively used in a sentence

Unimaginatively in a sentence as an adverb

For example I have lights on the left and right side of the room named, rather unimaginatively, "left" and "right". It sometimes hears "turn on right" as "turn on light".

The UI also looked complicated to me - two ways to control it - touch and the unimaginatively named crown thing. Which is again very un-Apple.

Not something I can unimaginatively test out myself in 2 minutes. However, for $100, is it worth your time?

Yes, that's well beyond the amount of building materials used, but not unimaginatively so.

It is a literary failure on my part to interpret it so unimaginatively, but it's only meant as a starting point.

War Games was more concerned with humans behaving unimaginatively rather than with AGI as such.

Legitimately the shittiest, most boring, and most unimaginatively dystopian use for AI I have ever seen.

The recent hype comes from Unity, because they very unimaginatively misappropriated the term.

But they usually were poorly built and unimaginatively designed, optimised for low cost, but with no practical understanding of community or community spaces. A typical UK block has some decorative grass around it, but that's it.

You can use it anywhere, from DOM to CLI. To tie it to DOM, a separate library exists—named, unimaginatively, ReactDOM—and that’s where the 100KB heft comes in. Preact is the opposite: smaller, but coupled to DOM. The architecture probably doesn’t facilitate cool stuff like render components to embedded LCD[0], and even to do SSR you would have to add extra libraries.

OT: > the unimaginatively-named python-for-android project. I love that name.

GWT does this de-skilling to testers instead; it's effectively TDD with tests in this quasi-human-readable format that gets unimaginatively translated into programs by the testers. The proposed solution is to do more communication through spreadsheet-prototypes.

Semi-relatedly, one of my greatest criticisms of all that stimulus spending of the last several years was how incredibly unimaginatively it was allocated. I've seen figures which indicate gigabit fiber could be rolled out nationally to 95%+ of homes and businesses for $400 billion if gov't paid it all, or $100 billion if done in a private/public partnership.

The actual interview text keeps hammering down on the same talking points so repetitively and unimaginatively, that it quickly becomes hard to get past first couple of pages. If a bit of information can be briefly, just for the sake of argument, defined as a difference that makes a difference, the book you mention makes a few starting laps and then halts at making a difference in its over-arching narrative with a remarkable braking force.

This lays out the inspiration behind material design, and differentiates it from skeumorphism: which copies real world elements unimaginatively, and simple "flat" design, which is not necessarily tactile or imbued with a system of animations or motion.

Our AI is speciously intelligent, our computers are woodenly interactive, our governments are unimaginatively democratic, and our corporations are predictably mercantile. There is a general feeling of living in a pre-cyberpunk present but little of that world has materialized and I feel, like notions of a coming atomic age, it will continue to languish unfulfilled until replaced by another fashionable future.