stratigraphy

Geologist here: I've studied in 1997-2003, than I've had a PhD in stratigraphy in 2007.

There's a geologic record, stratigraphy, and a fossil record that have to be accounted for.

I can't imagine stratigraphy would be terribly helpful.

There is an entire branch of geology dedicated to answering that question called stratigraphy [0].

We can "easily" correlate stratigraphy across wide areas, but most sedimentary rocks are hard to date.

For these particular fossils, the stratigraphy happens to contain a lot of volcanic ash units that can be directly dated.

The man being interviewed says that they're not using heavy machinery because it would destroy all the chances of doing a stratigraphy analysis.

Here we describe the stratigraphy, chronology, and mitochondrial DNA extracted from the sediments in BKC.

He never collected anything, and he discovered geology in his senior year in college, and from there he went to stratigraphy and finally to paleontology.

"As long as this cognitive process is acknowledged as the pragmatic basis of stratigraphy, both local and global sections can be treated as chronologies without reproach.

Those are 3 of the 7 principles of modern stratigraphy that wikipedia lists, but according to you and Kuhn the "modern paradigm" of geology starts in 1965 and everything before that's been erased?