Someone used in a sentence

Someone in a sentence as a noun

Let's go contract someone to, um, write some games for us.

You have the source, you can change it, or pay someone to change it, you can contribute back.

Are you trying to say that pg is friends with someone in spite of his supposed hateful nature?

"Not working for someone else" was never really on the table.

I wish I knew someone who used Opera so I could ask them to start boycotting it.

" I mean, I was joking, but no... the only API call we offer is to get someone's stream.

It's about helping someone solve a problem in five minutes that would have taken them hours to solve on their own.

The existence of startups isn't a guarantee that you'll never need to work for someone else again.

I mean, someone reverting your code because of a personal vendetta?

If someone can produce 20 videos that seem decent and want to do more as part of the Khan Academy, we'll point our audience at them.

When that calmed down and another officer came by to drop off someone else, I told him what had happened and his only response was "so?

Not to psycho-analyze too much, but the lack of vote scores removes the pressure to have the best comment or a better score than someone that has a different perspective.

As someone who was a student in your class, I can speak for myself and say that I did give you a low rating, and it was NOT because you punished the cheatersit was far from it.

Think of it this way: had your company been successful, it almost certainly would have left you in a state where you'd be working for someone else for a couple years during your earnout.

Preferably something that someone else is already paying money for but that the incumbent product is shitty or lacking in some major way.

I don't really get this T, i understand its going for minimalism, but would someone who frequents HN recognize it if they did not already know its affiliation?

Give them the powers, and they will be misused - in this case they were used on a relative of someone nothing to do with terrorism purely for the purpose of intimidation.

This was someone who voluntarily put in long hours and went out of his way to teach others, and did everything he could to help other departments like operations and other teams.

The new guy was arguably the most talented guy in the company by a considerable margin, so he thought someone building a $700K home might've been overextending themselves.

And, if someone already has vast power over you, it is but a small step to extend that power in a technological age by using technology to spy upon, intimidate, and control people.

In every one of those ******** articles, someone had to marshall real arguments, chase down real sources, and in many cases defend those arguments against both bona fide Wikipedia contributors and also sockpuppets of the subjects of the article.

Therefore, if no-one notices a problem like this until after the planning submission, or perhaps fails to get someone higher up to take it seriously enough to change the concept design, then they will have to remedy it by using special anti glare coatings or just plain hoping it wont be too bad.