self-aggrandizement

From what I've seen over the years, Wu-Tang has a propensity for such self-aggrandizement (and I mean that as a complement).

There's a reason that self-glorification and bildungsromans are such pervasive motifs; it's not just self-aggrandizement, its self-affirmation.

That's what happens when you take your eyes off the actual goal (equality of opportunity) and focus on feel-good self-aggrandizement.

So the web should be a place solely for advertisement, astroturf and ludicrous self-aggrandizement?

To appeal to people's self-aggrandizement is a very powerful motivation in this case.

How does self-aggrandizement, for example, result from evaluating how people have solved problems?

His intentions were far from honorable and more akin to self-aggrandizement than honest debate about the role of government in our communications privacy.

I always found JS rather tasteless, so, naturally predisposed to think somewhat uncharitably of its author, I'm going to assume it's self-aggrandizement.

It has less incentive for self-aggrandizement compared to onstage presentations.

Berlin on the other hand, represents some of the very silly self-aggrandizement and hype Berlin is prone to, which hasn't been helped with their acquisition by Axel-Springer.

Should we reject every author for having an ulterior motive of self-aggrandizement?

It enables self-aggrandizement, ambition, and big budgets.

The concern or even attention to "self-aggrandizement" is itself a form of social status policing.

Creating "useful content" is not a valid excuse for usurping community for your own self-aggrandizement.

To me, calling yourself "CEO" of a tiny startup reeks of self-aggrandizement, which is the sort of attitude that rubs me the wrong way.

It's complete mythologising of two people "building" a company, it's display of hurt feeling over the fact that $10bn doesnt impress people enough, its utter pre-occupation with self-aggrandizement and money.