Satirize used in a sentence

Satirize in a sentence as a verb

That was a joke, intended by Marc Jacobs to satirize the fashion industry.

This satire was written by someone who does not understand what he or she is attempting to satirize.

It's kind of like those "parody" movies that satirize pop culture, except they don't really, they just... present it.

So many absurd things happen so quickly out here, I feel he'll have plenty of things to satirize. There'll be an endless supply of fodder for Judge.

Conforming to the very stereotypes the project served to satirize in the first place.

Plus, it's always easier to satirize politicians than programmers.

Merely humorous comments detract from the true comedic function of Hacker News, to satirize Reddit. I'm kidding?

Like trying to satirize alternative medicine; it's hard to come up with something funny that hasn't been seriously claimed.

It's impossible to satirize audiophiles because the real thing is already so extreme that there's no room for fake humor on top of it.

Back to programming languages, one thing that always bothers me is why new ones keep appearing" sounds like it was written to satirize that sort of perspective.

Watching it I felt like Mike Judge is really out of his element in terms of being able to satirize something he's only familiar with through news articles. More often it's catered food or food trucks - not ramen noodles.

It seems to be poking fun at the competitive nature of American academia I honestly can't tell what it's trying to satirize.

I've been through a lot of hiring processes, on both sides of the desk, and I don't know what the article is trying to satirize. The worst, most bizarre hiring process I've ever been involved with bore no resemblance to anything in this little drama, and the analogy is bad.

See how they've even turned against Banksy for his so-called "anti-immigrant" piece, which was meant to satirize anti-immigration ideas.

I disagree with the assertion in the linked blog post that it's not possible to satirize -isms - in fact, I firmly believe it's necessary to expose the utter ridiculousness of these beliefs. Which, incidentally, is what the OP did with her anti-bot.

I've not seen the film, but I would assume it is using the idea of a future "dumb" humanity to satirize current "dumb" humanity. The fact that lots of people currently believe exactly this theory about societal decline due to the lower classes breeding too much just underlines this.

You can cite your experience ignoring it, you can say some nice things about the importance of experience and priorities and managing trade-offs, and you can satirize people who are dogmatic to the point of becoming cult-zombies. It appears as if such an essay providing great advice.

Relevant points to the question "Why would anyone post a parody in a root blog" "The purpose of the piece was to satirize startup culture... I love HackNY, and I love startup culture although I find it really amusing at times."

There's just no room to satirize something this ridiculous. For Apple to maintain its market-leading brand prestige and profit margins it has to be hands-down better than the competition and no matter how much heavy breathing hype you want to shower on them the last two iPhones have been predictable, incremental upgrades that in some important ways are actually playing catch-up to the competition.

Or is it only safe to satirize culture if the subject of the satire has ethnic roots in the Caucuses? Or is it not about ethnicity, but appearance? Is it enough if they merely appear white? Because that opens the comedic landscape far beyond the Caucasus. Can we satirize Mexican culture, provided we limit it to Mexicans of European descent?

Similar to the way one might satirize traditional marriage by pointing out that tradition advocates a lot of things that traditional marriage people would find abhorrent, if you take a view of tradition that extends past the start of the industrial revolution.

I read this piece as using the "what if the DSM was a novel" part mostly as a jumping-off point to satirize how we treat the idea of happiness and normality, rather than being explicitly a criticism of the manual itself as a diagnostic tool. A "weak interpretation" of the DSM where it's a collection of clustered symptoms, together with some advice about what treatments appear to have worked or not worked in the past for them, wouldn't really run into that.

The point is to satirize intelligent lifeforms less than 9 light-minutes from Sol, who think "alien" and immediately think "A bipedal humanoid with colorful skin and Buddhist-by-way-of-Native-American spiritual practices."