rescission

This is a story about rescission, which, thanks to the ACA, is now illegal across the entire US.

One way to think about it is that you're paying an extra $120/mo for protection against rescission.

That on top of the article about rescission that was in here yesterday, should make people think.

Bob's could get good rescission and George's could get bad reception impacting making George's experience worse.

I sympathize with the position of an unpaid developer and, if the case is extreme enough, rescission laws do enable one to break such a contract.

The group policy should cover these types of issues, without risk of rescission[1].

Besides, while rescission was rare, annual maximums and lifetime maximums were not.

But bad investments do happen, and so did the rescission.

Or you get kicked off due to rescission.

If possible, applying penalties to salesmen who don't conduct due diligence to verify clients' identities, or penalties for cancelling a service before rescission periods end could help, too.

That said, I'm not opposed to smokers paying higher premiums — but that practice already exists, based on policyholder disclosure, or rescission in the event of fraud.

This assumes that your insurer has no grounds for rescission (i.e., to retroactively rescind its coverage of your health care costs because you misled them about your medical history at enrollment).

Even the existing private insurance market was pretty reliable here ("rescission" was vanishingly rare).

It won't be counted as "rescission" even though the industry benefits from it (and the people hurt because of it) in exactly the same way.

Further access by 3Taps after that rescission was “without authorization.” > The banned user has to follow only one, clear rule: do not access the website.

My understanding is that "rescission" was extremely rare.