overrating

If you're coming to that conclusion, you're overrating the complexity of the thought process that goes into online harassment.

So you're either ignoring OP's very interesting points or you're tendentiously overrating an issue.

TL:DR; Dell did mess up their amplifier design, but not by overrating the amplifier, but by underrating it.

Using that has really convinced me that people are overrating the importance of intelligence in LLMs in terms of driving real economic value.

You're vastly overrating the size of the burble that HN sits in.

I'm not overrating (really, overestimating) anybody's collective importance, I simply think degradability is a good idea.

An open letter comparing him to Dave Chapelle is probably not a good plan, given his statement: Press people are overrating the success of my games.

People are also erroneously overrating things all the time.

Humans have a history of overrating our own competence.

Possibly overrating the green field Amazon has left.

You're overrating fame as an indicator of merit.

I apprieciate that you try to tell me that you think I'm overrating myself, but I'd like it if you had some ground to do so.

Nguyen via Twitter: "Press people are overrating the success of my games.

Things like iPods and Ubuntu aren't seamless I think you are overrating those "advertised benefits".

I don't know for sure, but I feel there are better ways to rate a candidate other than asking them a question, that, if they answer "10" on, means they aren't suitable and are likely overrating themselves.

"A players are banished to spend the rest of their lives in specialized communities like Silicon Valley?" This sounds to me more like "tribal overrating" bias (I invented this bias myself:) ).

Overrating your skill shows that you lack self-judgement, this girl overrated her own skill so they hired her.