non-believers

The point is that it should be ok to be skeptical but it seems that climate change has become a religious debate with believers and non-believers.

The whole thing smells like just another move to convince the non-believers into thinking NK was responsible for the Sony hack.

Taliban goes around beheading people of a different sect of their own faith, they behead non-believers as well as government officials.

There are limitations--non-believers usually can't be part of leadership (one of the reasons being the reason you gave)--but it's part of the Church's mission to bring to goodness of God, community included, to non-believers.

It really annoys me when non-believers attempt to psychoanalyze those of us who are.

I'd hate to be associated with Radical Atheists if ever a violent act of terrorism was performed by non-believers.

Sometimes we overachievers just have to drag the non-believers along, kicking and screaming the whole way.

The holy books of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all contain passages encouraging their followers to torture, kill, and otherwise harm non-believers.

I'd trust the non-believers for now) they do, that is not enough to be safe.

I have never bothered to explain why it works intellectual to non-believers.

The Soviet Union and its satellite states managed to reduce religious belief fairly effectively, in the Czech Republic ~70% are atheist / non-believers, East Germany has similar numbers.

Edit: Ok, so there are still some non-believers.

There are not only "believers" and "non-believers" in any issue.