nirvana

Amsterdam is a bit of a hipster town, like people who work in advertising or make iOS applications, not a nirvana for nerds.

Hetzner is nirvana for pre-ramen profitable big data startups.

This is not the case with dropbox - I've experienced multiple scary occurrences of old versions going to the nirvana with certain user actions.

We are not, no matter what 'nirvana thinks, going to reset the federal government around his interpretation of the Constitution.

It's unfair to characterize all startups as nirvana, and it's likewise unfair to label them all as run by evil masterminds taking advantage of their employees.

They believed wealth would be an end-in-itself, and upon reaching that holy grail of financial security, they were struck with the terrible realization that there was no instant nirvana waiting for them.

There's this pattern I've noticed, where whenever a constitutional issue comes up on HN, nirvana makes this post that starts with a complete constitutional misunderstanding followed by a Randist rant.

This arrogantly assumes that everyone is in the same boat as those at Microsoft addicted for life to Windows and willing to put up with yet more years of change and inconvenience, to get to some future nirvana.

I would tend to agree wrt HN nitpicking except in this case nirvana is presenting himself as the paragon of objectivity setting the story straight against the unwashed rabble of knee-jerk Apple haters, when in fact he is nowhere near objective when it comes to Apple, and shooting ignorant fish in a barrel is not good enough to validate his points.