Murderer used in a sentence

Murderer in a sentence as a noun

If you murdered someone in 1995, would you be a murderer?

Appropriate response: "If we convict the wrong guy, the real murderer goes free, you realize".

I think you're a murderer. Anyone who defends you is defending ******.

If he was an axe murderer is irrelevant. What is relevant is are those documents real.

People throw a tizzy when a murderer gets let off because they weren't read their rights, but if that didn't happen no one would have their rights read. It's just how the system keeps police and prosecutors in line.

Anyone can attack and **** bad persons, and if you killed even more people you were a murderer and it took a very long time to return to normal. You want to use super awesome powerful gear?

However, the author must have decided that this wasn't actually one of those times, seeing as he changed the title to Don't be a goat murderer...

Some courageous soldiers attempted to get an elusive mass murderer and bring him to justice. During the attempt there was a firefight and he was killed in the exchange.

If the law is the law, and the law says that someone downloading academic papers carries the same punishment as a murderer or rapist, then the law needs to be changed. A fundamental shift needs to take place.

> The officer said it was Heiss's fellow inmate - fellow murderer Shane Baker - who made the key. He said Baker was a jeweller who had jewellery-making equipment in his cell, and used this to work on the key.

Anyone can attack and **** bad persons, and if you killed even more people you were a murderer and it took a very long time to return to normal. This Blue/Gray/Red name system created a sort of cautiousness among travelers.

For example they had presumed the murderer had to be found amongst the nurses, other possibilities were neglected. They also hadn't corrected for combined P-values.

The actual murderer was given a life sentence because he took a plea. The only silver lining I can take from all this is that because things suck and the US is a huge unified market, it is a great country to innovate and solve people's problems with technology.

You a liar/thief/vagabond/ruffian/scoundrel/bully/********/*******/arsonist/murderer/sexist/racist. If even 10% of that is true, it is a serious allegation against you.

A fugitive murderer had used his name as an alias and through that, he'd developed a relationship with him and interviewed him after the person was convicted.

Just because somebody isn't a serial murderer doesn't mean they are beneficial to society. Ruthless businessmen and politicians can cause far more damage than Ted Bundy ever did.

If you take a typical rapist or murderer, and a typical grey-hat hacker, the latter will be better off in prison than the former, at least at the start of their sentences. However, a prisoner can choose to make it worse for himself by not obeying rules once in prison.

The wealthy murderer who decides to unleash these does so without any skin in the game, without any chance of dealing with repercussions back home for lost sons and daughters, without any care whatsoever except for a line-item expense. Stubborn rebel holdout?

Sweden has recently visited a different embassy to interview a suspected murderer. Sweden was invited to interview Assange in the embassy in London.

If the police were to start a policy of giving out free GPS handguns to anyone, they might justify it by saying that they have caught more murderers since the policy began. The metric itself is flawed, as it assumes that catching a murderer it good in and of itself, and is in fact better than preventing a ****** in the first place.

I actually saw his face on the evening news and my heart started racing, because they made it seem as though he was the murderer, but as events came out, he and his beautiful children were the victims. It was really horrible because he was one of the star programmers at work and responsible for a lot of the success in the company.

Al-Awlaki built up a serial murderer's resume as a sponsor, planner, and coordinator of multiple attacks on civilians in the US and UK. The only reason anyone questions his role in those attacks is because they ususally failed --- the planes didn't blow up, the stab victims didn't die. People have strange ideas of how "citizenship" works.

I could certainly go walk outside and push someone in front of a bus right now, but assuming Im a murderer just because I could is not a good assumption. Conflicts of interest certainly raise the possibility of wrongdoing and should be scrutinized, but the simple existence of a conflict of interest is not proof of wrongdoing; for that you need not aspersions but, well, proof.