maximalist

Although you might think the author is being maximalist, you don't need to respond in kind.

Does it allow for the more maximalist expressions, or does it hold that they're flawed in their philosophy?

Wouldn't the rest of you benighted nations like to enjoy the fruits of our maximalist copyright regime as well?

Ulysses is maximalist, The Unnameable is minimalist.

That would imply there is a more extreme interpretation that would qualify as maximalist.

I'm suspicious of that assertion only because it ignores the fact that the copyright-maximalist lobby has used the U.

For argument's sake let's say you are right, that it is not maximalist.

It's not maximalist to say that a website cannot make a copy of something for someone who owns the item in another form.

Sorry, but tempered reasoning like this is not acceptable in the maximalist society we have today.

In that sense, it might be more of a maximalist approach than what I'm looking for.

That is true under a maximalist interpretation of copyright.

From a maximalist perspective you are quite correct.

Without a maximalist attitude, do you foresee a point where the language is declared as "done" and all the full-time devs just pack up and move on?

It's different for simple BT notification buzzers, but "maximalist" smartwatches like the Apple Watch surely call out for the latest and greatest semiconductor processes.

"A Minimalist Text Adventure"-- What would a maximalist text adventure look like?

I also prefer the spirit of the Noisebridge reply to Dreamworks [1] – roughly, "you should be embarrassed for even thinking you need to ask" – to copyright-maximalist freeze-frame nit-picking.