magisteria

It struck me as idealistic because there's another magisteria that he didn't mention.

As we learn more and more fundamentally independent propositions and unite our disparate magisteria: wir müssen wissen, wir werden wissen!

Isn't that basically just a restatement of the whole non-overlapping magisteria argument?

People usually have separate magisteria for this kind of thing...

Questions regarding it may belong to a different magisteria altogether.

I remember reading Stephan Jay Gould writing about multiple magisteria - science and religion.

I get what you're saying, but I don't consider the two things separate magisteria.

Theists won't care, although I suppose some will mutter something about separate magisteria.

As long as these are non overlapping magisteria.

Further, how is it possible for you to evaluate the quality of personal growth independently from all the nonoverlapping magisteria out of which every every life is composed?

For such magisteria, you can attract skilled engineers to make things work, and naturally those same engineers can make Linux work on the meso-devices of the desktop realm.

Do the magisteria of science and money overlap?

But I’m concerned with the practicalities of religious practice and those of science and the “constantly-overlapping magisteria” of material claims.

The concept of “non-overlapping magisteria” (science for the real world, religion for the imaginary) has been thoroughly thumped by those daring enough to ask the relevant questions.

Stephen Jay Gould dubbed this "Non-Overlapping Magisteria".

"Isn't that basically just a restatement of the whole non-overlapping magisteria argument?" -- No.