macs

The macs are for work, the PC is for games (and occasional windows testing).

Woohoo -- thanks for calling out my previous employer, which also built Macs for a good while (in Colorado).

Those specific pieces of software alone kept me away from Macs for years because the PC ports were so terrible.

Unfortunately, Macs are getting pretty popular here - even though they are double in cost.

Some of the few die-hard Windows folks are even getting Macs and dual booting Windows.

All* the PCs have DVD drives they can't use, and all the Macs can play DVDs just fine except they don't have drives.

My mother is a teacher and she uses Macs in her classroom so she was already receptive to non Windows options which probably helped.

The kids could also not have Macs and there are similar services for running C# online, so those reasons don't hold any water with me.

Adding more Macs will just be changing the mix.

It's a time-honored coding technique, which I first saw on the 68000-based Macs in the 80s, and which probably dates back much earlier.

Refurbished Macs have the same warranty as non-refurbished.

My first draft of the post was along the lines that my Macs can all play DVDs just fine, er, except none of them have DVD drives anyway so....

So the article title is "Former Apple rival IBM could become the biggest buyer of MacBooks" And the submission title is "IBM to Purchase 200000 Macs Annually with 75% of Empl.

It says that 50-75% of employees could switch, and that IBM could purchase up to that many Macs.

This calculation does not depend on the cost of foods that aren't Big Macs.

Hackintoshes exist, yet Apple still sells Macs, because they are a great hardware company.