Liquidity used in a sentence

Liquidity in a sentence as a noun

The robots can provide liquidity for a fraction of the price.

When they give you some BS about the stock being worth X ask them about liquidity events.

If you think the chance of liquidity is very low, then your expected value could effectively be zero.

As an employee I invest my time, and I expect a liquidity preference, just like the company's VCs do.

People see market makers as scalpers when in fact they're providing a valuable service: they're creating liquidity.

The debate is about whether that extra liquidity is actually of any practical use.

It's common to have a single name trade on several lit venues, and when you count dark pools/other forms of liquidity, that number can easily approach twenty or thirty.

Relatedly, your discount rate is probably too low, and you probably overestimate your odds of a liquidity event and the upside potential.

Economists call this property ‘liquidity,’ and it basically means ‘how easy is it for me to get what I want with this commodity.’Stop calling currencies commodities.

Given all of the above, and given that IPOs remain at far below the old bubble levels in frequency, it can be risky to lay out any excessive cash to exercise at any time before a liquidity event.

HFT people will argue that they provide more liquidity in the market - it's easier to sell your stocks because HF traders increase the overall volume, etc. However, it's in effect launched an arms race between different trading firms and some people say that they're literally making money by skimming off everyone else who trades stocks.

What I discovered, quite starkly, is that the part of Wall Street that I worked in was simply transferring wealth from the less sophisticated investors often teachers pension funds and factory workers retirement accounts, to the more sophisticated investors...""'We are important providers of liquidity that create stable financial markets.

I think the idea of a startup should not be so narrowly defined, however, and the big reason is this: many founders set out to build ventures that are tech-based, innovative, aimed at winning key niches via hoped-for rapid growth and scaling, positioned for outside funding as suited to their needs, and aimed at liquidity via capital gains as the primary ROI for their efforts .

In that case, the debt vanishes and the noteholder becomes an equity holder and everybody wins in terms of optimal positioning of their respective stakes in the venture: founders have gotten their cheap stock that they can hold until a liquidity event, at which time they can sell typically for long-term capital gains and with no intervening taxes to pay; noteholders have gotten their equity stakes with all protections and with no-less-favorable pricing than that offered to the preferred stock investors who presumably have negotiated a good, arms-length deal for themselves; the company avoids a too-early high repricing of its stock so it can continue to offer good incentives to new team members as they join; and the company does not usually have to fool with 409A valuations or with other strings and formalities attending the bringing in of investors via equity rounds.