lipton

The article is in fact interested in that more intuitive mathematics; Lipton points out that this intuitive mathematics---whether as formal as 4CT or as informal as the vision conjecture he describes---is full of fun surprises.

He says he makes most of his money selling fried rice by the 5-gallon bucket and lipton hot tea.

Not sure it beats coffee, but it's a lot closer than Lipton would have us believe.

But I'm sure you're content with the high quality instant coffee and Lipton tea that you drink throughout the day.

Bruce Lipton - The Biology of Perception.

I like green thea ( real one, not lipton), it has multiple health benefits and improves your metabolism - If you use the weight scale, use it on a weekly basis.

So it's certainly plausible that you could take advantage of this to reduce the precision enough to get to the size bound Lipton mentioned, especially if, as implied, you had the might of a hundred Google engineers working on it.

I am the co-author of the textbook mentioned as "Lipton" in the comment by user dmmackay above.

- Doron Zeilberger's "a lot more interesting" take is completely subsumed in Richard Lipton's blogpost, in that it mentions other possibilities beyond the basic "what if it's polynomial with a really huge exponent" scenario.

I would even suggest that there are more and more scientific authors showing up who are helping to bridge the gap between "chaos magic" concepts and hard science (see Rupert Sheldrake, Bruce Lipton, Michael Talbot, and others) "I regard consciousness as fundamental.

Lipton wrote a pretty decent and short intro to QC that builds the theory a little differently from usual.

Lipton is great to read to get a survey of different math/cc topics.

This is probably Lipton's mindset, seeing as he's a theorist.