lawns

Yes, lawns are a terrible waste (footnote: did you know that lawns trace back to medievel times?

So too, lawns make people happy so they spend a whole lot of money making sure they have neat, green lawns.

Mowing 50% of lawns in the US means nothing if you still net a loss.

If the infrastructure is available, it would be interesting to force things like watering lawns with only water from something like a desalination plant.

You go to the people who live by the country club and offer to mow big lawns for $50.

You buy a lawnmower with the $100 and use it to mow lawns for $10 an hour.

After 2 weeks (80 hours), you have made $800 mowing lawns which would have been impossible without the loan.

Aesthetically, it might seem more natural than asphalt, but lawns are a long way from ‘nature’.

Growing food for people takes far more water than lawns and toilets and factories.

I could steal all the lawn mowing business in town if I were willing to mow lawns for free...

I reckon crops (even the less important non-staple ones) are more important than green lawns right now.

I live in Los Angeles proper, and the majority of my neighbors already had low-water lawns to begin with.

Indeed, it seems like the paragraph: > After the talk about “Poetry, Drumming and Mathematics”, we arrived at the appointed time at the Bose–Einstein Guest House to find our man, with his mother, standing transfixed by the deer grazing on the lawns.

Lawns are a smaller problem, but are truly a complete waste, with no productive value given in return.