Killable used in a sentence

Killable in a sentence as an adjective

Or, they make un-killable batteries that let us Tweet deep into the night. They make solar cells worthwhile or water out of thin air.

Thank God this forced login popup is killable via browser's developer tools. But why oh why did they put this on their page?

Oh, I wasn't suggesting that it was about killable vs. unkillable.

As long as iBooks is open the process is un-killable. So essentially I can't use iBooks on the go.

Apple even has sudden termination API that iTunes could use to make it safely killable most of the time. needs to quit iTunes in the first place.

One which is only killable by fire, the other by ice, the last one is invincible but tries to bite you. When the outer heads are dead the third head transforms to a fast moving snake which you have to hit at a specific point to damage.

If you are impossible to **** then you are still killable? If numbers cannot be divided by zero but it is still "divisible" by zero because I can make a fool hardy attempt at it?

But if Reddit survives this, if it's just "clearing house" for a future set of users, and, after a period of lower usage, start growing again, it will be golden; it will be seen as un-killable. Too valuable a resource to fail.

The Android codebase may not be killable, but Android as a platform certainly is. Google is the only thing holding Android together; if they pull out or a major OEM or carrier grows balls, they'll fork and the ecosystem will shatter.

They were just too slow and killable in the dinosaur era to do anything more than just stick to tiny enclaves where the big dinos couldn't get them. After the KT event that killed the dinosaurs, mammals sought to fill the niches left by dinosaurs.

But even if BitCoin is not "killable", it certain can fail to meet the goals set out for it, and it is pretty much within the power of the US government, and for that matter several others, to make that happen. You don't have to destroy it utterly to make it useless.

Piracy is not killable without taking away the ability to communicate privately and probably not even then. Soviet attempts merely lead to Samizdat, in spite of going to extreme lengths to track people down.

By day 4 of 8, you've killed the 85% most killable bacteria, and your symptoms are gone, so you stop. Then you have leftover bacteria that your immune system may or may not be able to handle, but you can still pass it to someone else who doesn't have an immune system primed to fight it off, so their infection starts with the 85th percentile bacteria.

You can implement this cleanly using mutexes and conditions, by creating a "killable semaphore" synchronization primitive. While this is similar to a semaphore as an idea, it's very difficult to implement it if semaphores are the only primitive you have.

I imagine practical considerations are keeping these bugs in there, eg I can imagine the effort of making all processes killable would stand in no relation to the gains - its hard to do, and rare to occur,

So the difference is the "killable" status of suspected Al-Qaeda members must be established by due process, but for enemy soldiers the "due process" is simply the identification of their uniform. Then what is the effective and ethical way of waging war against non-uniformed enemy?

A better example of Emergent behavior might be something that implements A and B it also incitements C if C is a subset of A and B. Or if your refactoring and decide to split an interface so what was X is now Y and Z. Consider adding unkillable NPC's to a game. Rather than having special code to handle MOB's that you can't **** you remove HP's from the MOB interface and add a killable interface and now the type system helps you refactor your code by complaining when you try to harm something without HP's.

> I'm pretty sure there are hosting services who can just take your site offline if you exceed your bandwidth quota Having my website instant-killable "for fun" by any bored script kiddy living in a country thousands of km away from me is not a particularly interesting proposition.