jurist

So I guess we need a jurist to rule ...

A jurist is a judge or a legal scholar.

In short, he's an extremely acclaimed and well regarded jurist.

And not being the image of an ancient, out-of-touch jurist:"Pregerson: And you're a great lawyer.

She turned to journalism when she realized that power players were more upset by what she wrote than what she did as a jurist.

You don't need to be an attorney or a jurist to twist words around, postulate social contexts, and invent hidden meanings.

[3]In its general sense, the phrase can be traced back to the 16th century, and it was popularized in the 19th century by British jurist A. V. Dicey.

If their theory had won out, judges would be called upon to do double duty as literary critics, which no sane jurist would go anywhere near.

I've only followed this case at a bit of a distance, but it seems to me that Judge William Alsup is a fantastic jurist, and very amusing at that.

In "Language: Intro to Study Speech" he remarks: "It is safe to prophesy that within a couple of hundred years from to-day not even the most learned jurist will be saying "Whom did you see!

""I shudder to think what a sensitive and intelligent criminologist, jurist, or physicist would take away from a rigorous course in the foundations of knowledge.

Judge Posner is indeed a brilliant and highly-respected jurist and his views on our problematic patent system will undoubtedly resonate and help the cause of reform.

I'm jurist cum developer in Belgium, I spent a decade in this niche:* Jurists are used to face extraordinary difficulties when researching things.