Inquisitively used in a sentence

Inquisitively in a sentence as an adverb

I would simply ask if they got a new phone or re-installed WhatsApp. A few would inquisitively ask "Yes, how did you know?" , then I would explain them to them the notification I got.

But refusing to talk about it or look at it inquisitively, at all, ever, is just as irresponsible. As is Twitter censoring links to it.

They are not likely to respond "inquisitively" to someone who describes achieving better speeds with a "less powerful" system that costs a fraction of what they paid. More likely, they will try to discredit them.

They're both looking at this news inquisitively, trying to understand the forces behind the public actions of HP following their recent mutation. If you're voting it down, just be sure you're not doing so out of disagreement with the points raised.

The younger crowd is more likely to inquisitively understand computers better and realize they aren't just a dumb tool to be used to view facebook.

Free-flow, curious, toying with concepts and inquisitively seeing if they can be pushed beyond their normal expectations...

It depends on whether people would talk more, and more inquisitively, about "disappear" as compared with talking about a "car crash" one. It also depends on the relative practical difficulties in orchestrating the two kinds of hits.

"The younger crowd is more likely to inquisitively understand computers better and realize they aren't just a dumb tool to be used to view facebook." Why would the younger crowd of the future be any more likely to want to understand the underlying workings of a computer than today's younger crowd who uses a computer to view Facebook?

He would run through fields, climb trees, chase animals, play with model tractors, make loud noises, inquisitively inspect minutiae of nature. One of his parents was an unrelated medical practitioner, and the pair of them dedicated immense time and energy to attending all possible events and reading all possible books to understand the nature of their son's condition.

Trying to understand how a new idea or product relates to existing stuff is obviously a useful topic of discussion, but depending whether it’s phrased/expressed inquisitively or aggressively could make a big difference. Something like the title of the post under discussion – “someone else had your idea first” – is one of the less productive ways to phrase things, IMO. Personally, I love answering these kinds of questions and can easily be sent either into passionate “prove why I’m right” mode or passionate “let’s look at this logically/scientifically” mode.

But here's a description of what I saw: -Ref inquisitively looks at Fabiano, pointing to his arm -Fabiano jokingy shakes his head, smiling, waving his hands in front of himself -Ref laughs, points to his chest incredulously as if indicating that is in fact what made contact with the ball For me, given the deliberate pointing, this interchange was pretty clear. Even if he did mean something along the lines of what you said, it's terribly inappropriate to do something that could even be interpreted that way.