Inequitable used in a sentence

Inequitable in a sentence as an adjective

In the process you'll hopefully break things for enough people that we see change, or you'll at least demonstrate how blatantly inequitable most of these laws are. Both are good steps toward real change.

All this tiresome '1% unfair inequitable boo hoo not fair' whining is unproductive and self indulgent. If you want wealth or success get out and try and achieve it.

On the other hand, it feels very inequitable and unjust that Karpeles made millions off of MtGox, lost our money and then is free to enjoy life. But that's a vengeful mindset, and it seems counterproductive.

In theory, the data is used to answer questions about "how racist/inequitable is America these days", and given some of the uglier bits of our history, this is an important question to answer. I just wish we did not have to ask it.

In that case, the value shifts would not be significant for most users of BC, nor would inequitable balances result in inequitable cultures. Having BC just means you don't have to pay a conversion/transaction fee.

This makes them expensive and inequitable. I have no problem with charity and there is a ligitimate place for it within a community, but I disagree that governments are effecient at running them.

So, if we have markets that routinely deliver inequitable outcomes it's perfectly reasonable to ask - why is this happening?

If you find this inequitable then laws need to be changed. On the other hand big corporations as well as wealthy people usually have more leverage in terms of being able to move and operate or reside in more tax-friendly or hospitable regimes.

An 80/20 split may sound terribly inequitable, but we're both paying a similar percentage of our earnings for rent, so it's quite equitable from that perspective. Absent this arrangement, I could still afford to live on my own, but I'd be left with less cash at the end of the month, and my place would seem a bit empty.

I know that you didn't make the claim that they were, but it's a logical half-step to "unequal is definitionally inequitable". My best colleagues made/make more than my average colleagues, at every place that I've worked, and that's exactly as it should be, IMO.

If Snowden really felt beforehand that the civilian justice system was so completely inequitable it seems weird that he'd have been so insistent on its involvement elsewhere.

Unless your proposal comes along with "and use those fees to provide housing for people to live next to the Walmart/pharmacy/bank that they work in so they don't have to pay to commute" then it seems pretty damn inequitable.

Which is essentially his first point of inequitable distribution >> "Some servers may decide to withhold a tipout, in a sense cheating the system, and the employers is precluded from redressing this"

When small differences are desperately sought out, and vast similarities are ignored, all to justify what is arguably an inequitable situation, I'm wary. Scientific sexism and scientific racism are not new.

>> If Snowden really felt beforehand that the civilian justice system was so completely inequitable it seems weird that he'd have been so insistent on its involvement elsewhere. The 'justice' system fulfils what power requires from it. It will be as inequitable with a trial as it has been with this whole fiasco.

Clearly, the thing that unites these viewpoints is the presence of inhuman and impersonal scale, together with the inequitable concentration of power that this scale implies. For comedy effect, I shall conflate Mammoth and Mammon and term this fear of large organisations "Mammonthophobia".

This is inherently inequitable, because it means people with more money or a willingness to appropriate the equipment of others will mine/dig/discover more coin. Of course, the argument is that since mining is rather random, in theory you can start mining on your small CPU tomorrow and hit some coin, or get a random amount of coin for a fixed amount of mining.

You're saying apparent skew by sex of characteristics is simply down to inequitable consideration of the populations? So, for example, men aren't in any way - as a population - stronger, say, and so more capable as bricklayers [in general] it's just that we're not analysing the populations properly?

Edit: it seems the implicit context in your post is that you would use this if it were free under a permissive license, but not if it costs money or is GPL. That's not an uncommon position, but it's not something that rises to a multi-paragraph complaint on HN. You're complaining about the "GPL" instead of complaining that "the authors want to charge money", and that seems inequitable and unfair. If they were just another tool vendor, you wouldn't have posted: basically you're punishing them for releasing free software.

I've spent the best part of 5 years trying to hose down the jetsons fantasies of people pushing ridiculous schemes like this as not only unworkable, but inequitable for forcing up a basic cost input of life - energy - for effectively vanity purposes of a small subset of the population. I usually cop a pile of flamebait and downvotes each time, but I do so because there seems to be a mass delusion going on, and this has become one of those things you can't say.

Quote Examples using Inequitable

This suggests to me an inequitable society. A society where at a young age women are already taught that they aren't supposed to be good at math. The top five countries where women scored better than men are Malta, Albania, Trinidad and Tobago, India, and Kyrgyzstan. Do you have any evidence of educational policies favoring women at the expense of men in these countries? As to the reading gap, of course this is an issue. Just as much effort that is put into bringing math scores to parity should be spent on the reading gap. Sweden is an example of equality, because even though there are plenty inequitable parts of their society they actively work to make those equitable.

Anonymous