gays

This means to protect the rights of the gays and the religious.

The specific baseless suggestion for this post: Ben Carson wants to kill gays (because he accepted an invitation).

When it only talked about the fact that gays were killed in the holocaust it was accruing upvotes.

Guess what, you are going to find that 95% of the time that gays fall into the second category.

Nope -- parental rights to education of their grade-school-age children does not equal demonizing gays as threats.

Sorry for the rant, but encryption is saving lives of gays, illegitimately prosecuted politicians and such.

But this is inconsistent, since no one would accept this logic if it were applied to Black people or gays.

In the meantime, it is only fair that the gays enjoy the same rights that the rest of us do.

Of course these organizations were then easily used by the Nazis to find all of the gays and lesbians in germany...

The imposition of this disability on gays and lesbians serves to disrespect and subordinate them.

Also, blacks and gays and senior citizens don't generally have a habit of proselytizing and judging others morally inferior based on differences.

However, I don't necessarily think they should be able to deny their offered service to bigots or gays.

Using your logic, we shouldn't have freed slaves either, because the "gays" will soon be able to marry, right?

"Now gays get the same treatment." Actually now ANY TWO people can get the same treatment.

Lawrence therefore drew upon principles of liberty and equality to define and pro - tect the rights of gays and lesbians, holding the State “cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime.” Id.