first-person

One 'side' is a non-anonymous first-person account from one of the major parties in the described event.

In the process they created the canonical example of a console first-person shooter, the genre that now dominates game sales.

I would group the OP's article in with a first-person editorial, not journalism.

The first few issues of The Economist were, in fact, written almost entirely by James Wilson, the founding editor, though he wrote in the first-person plural.

The other half of that is when your motion isn't translated 1:1 to your perspective in the game (e.g., exaggerated movements in a first-person shooter), that's when you can really feel simulation sickness.

If we're playing the pedant game, what I said was: > In the process they created the canonical example of a console first-person shooter Whatever one thinks about Microsoft's involvement in Halo, it wasn't going to be a console game at all without them.

Input lag is killer, and users are far less forgiving of it than with something like netflix, where lag between the server sending data and the client receiving data is fine (Keep in mind that most pixels change most frames in a first-person 3d game, so it doesn't compress all that well either).