expr is a command line utility on Unix and Unix-like operating systems which evaluates an expression and outputs the corresponding value.
expr
Definition, parts of speech, synonyms, and sentence examples for expr.
Editorial note
We can justify writing return (expr); using the same arguments that justify the sizeof (expr) convention.
Quick take
expr is a command line utility on Unix and Unix-like operating systems which evaluates an expression and outputs the corresponding value.
Meaning at a glance
The clearest senses and uses of expr gathered in one view.
Definitions
Core meanings and parts of speech for expr.
N
expr is a command line utility on Unix and Unix-like operating systems which evaluates an expression and outputs the corresponding value.
Example sentences
We can justify writing return (expr); using the same arguments that justify the sizeof (expr) convention.
This time the expr coming out of the macro is a copy and so it has no source info.
Suppose we represented Add instead as: case class Add(exprs: NonEmptyList[Expr with NotAdd]) extends Expr case class Const(value: Int) extends Expr with NotAdd case class...
There's really no need to have either section on lexer or parser when working with s-expr.
The type of the first operation would like more like this: notAddOp: Contains NotAdd a -> Expr a -> T a...
Each statement prints a value, but it would be rare to see something like `expr' be a mnemonic for that value.
For example, fact 'init variables and return expr' { should let(a=1,b=2){a+b} => 3; } to what point will the let bindings be valid?
For many people reading and/or writing C-style is easier than s-expr (Lisp).
Did they preserve the s-expr structures in the C++ version?
If you grok expr(), you grok the whole thing.
This reminds me of another article which I'm pretty sure was posted on HN as well about a single bit being randomly flipped on someone's `expr` binary as it was loaded in memory.
Yes, in this situation owned Expr pointers are returned, and fortunately I know that Expr contained no borrowed data (with a lack of lifetime annotation that is easy, but in C++ you might have to check) But there could be other pointers being passed around internally (eg replacing the old pointer from a field of an argument with a new one, one which actually is short lived or is being iterated over.
Quote examples
"They also sometimes group expressions and disambiguate precedence" But it's obvious: "expr ( [expr,]* expr)" is a call - always.
In the C++ Working Paper, the Standardese is N4527 5.2.2 [expr.call]/4 "When a function is called, each parameter (8.3.5) shall be initialized (8.5, 12.8, 12.1) with its corresponding argument." followed by 8.5 [dcl.init] where /17.8 has a nice example: "Note: An expression of type "cv1 T" can initialize an object of type "cv2 T" independently of the cv-qualifiers cv1 and cv2.
-> Expr 'NotAdd You could also use True and False instead of Add and IsAdd, or even type-level string literals as arbitrary symbols: data Expr:: Symbol -> * where Add:: [Expr "NotAdd"] -> Expr "IsAdd" Const:: Integer -> Expr "NotAdd"
Proper noun examples
I tend to end up writing `Expr` objects directly when I'm building larger macros as I find them much easier to reason about.
Frequently asked questions
Short answers drawn from the clearest meanings and examples for this word.
How do you use expr in a sentence?
We can justify writing return (expr); using the same arguments that justify the sizeof (expr) convention.
What does expr mean?
expr is a command line utility on Unix and Unix-like operating systems which evaluates an expression and outputs the corresponding value.
What part of speech is expr?
expr is commonly used as N.