Equivocate used in a sentence

Equivocate in a sentence as a verb

But what's clear is the ending was intended to be equivocate.

I'm honestly not sure how you can equivocate a haunted conscience with death.

If you want to abstract and equivocate enough, you can say anything.

Not sure where you're trying to go with that last part, but I disagree that one can equivocate car bombing, Fred Phelps, and RMS.

" We felt no need to question our forecasts, moderate them, or equivocate.

When politicians equivocate, I am reminded of a core theme in Macbeth.

All pedants do is push people to hedge, equivocate, and employ dense jargon to throw them off the scent, and where's the help to the rest of us in that?

To pick one example among many, a recent trend I've noticed is people who use "equivocate" when they really mean "equate".

Your comment seemed quite sarcastic, and looked to be trying to equivocate responsibility.

It's obvious that Nolan put the spinning scene because he deliberately wanted to leave an equivocate ending.

But I suspect, were he pressed on this position, he would equivocate, saying that his perspective is that of the individual entrepreneur.

I certainly don't mean to equivocate developed and developing poverty, but I also don't agree with the inverse.

In general, if you're trying to make some other major point in an article, it's best to equivocate on things that you think would be inflammatory and irrelevant.

However, there is a very strong trend in this industry to equivocate around titles and responsibilities.

There's bad **** going on, but to equivocate the current state of the US to the Third Reich demonstrates either a supremely poor understanding of history, or hyperbolic melodrama, or both.

The milder defenders will equivocate and claim that its just a preference, and that subversion isn't nearly as painful as long as everyone on the team always unfailingly follows this list of 178 rules on what not to do.

Is it fair to equivocate the one or two sentence front-page hooks to the thinking that these people do on a regular basis?edit: intriguing that ambivalence and I posted almost the same thing simultaneously!

If I had given away 6000 free mp3s or movies via a P2P system you can bet they'd try me in court for the full price of them all, but in this article already they are equivocating saying "oh but they were free, less people would have paid for it so he can't realistically ask for all the money for all the copies we gave away".How come when a big company gets "ripped off" they can charge far more than the retail price for every copy but when the actual creator gets ripped off he gets nothing and people equivocate on even the numbers?