Endorser used in a sentence

Endorser in a sentence as a noun

I would even go further and give endorser rights to the OP on a Ask/Show HN post.

If you can get 1 key investor or endorser, you're pretty much in. How do you get that key?

And I'm going to want to control what ads I appear in, just like every other endorser.

; Click on the skill where you want to remove endorsers and then uncheck any endorser you want to remove. ; When youre done, click on Save;

That could pose a dilemma to the endorser too. Two comments with similar text: do you only endorse one?

For the type of influencer you are referring to I prefer to use the words "product endorser". Because that's really what it boils down to.

He's more like a celebrity endorser. One who happens to be fictional.

Would you want to know that when you’re evaluating the endorser’s glowing recommendation? You bet.

But I feel like that's an easier task than trying to derive meaning from endorsements that cost the endorser nothing, and hence mean nothing. If the stakes aren't real, the results aren't real.

But its getting little too far with adding my face as an endorser. Like the guy who is mentioned in this article; I may share items out of amusements but that doesn't mean I endorse that product.

If I'm going to appear in ads, then I want a cut of the revenue, just like every other compensated endorser.

Kobe is a Nike endorser. Tim Cook sits in the board at Nike. So, Apple is following the lead of Samsung, that got LeBron as an endorser, in its marketing effort?

In fact, it just makes you a tacit endorser of their extremist, partisan behavior and furthers the divide.

Even if you want to argue that their actual product is the ads around the videos, Will Ferrell is more than just a celebrity endorser.

Not as a wholesale controller and endorser of Stallman's ideas and personality." I recall being told early in my freshman year “If RMS hits on you, just say ‘I’m a vi user’ even if it’s not true&=&."

I reckon linked in should have mandatory comments on an endorsement to explain why or what experience that endorser had regarding your skill.

So now, if I post a comment that an "endorser" disagrees with they can effectively delete that comment independently? Or do flagged comments remain open to be allowed ["endorsed"] by others?

One concern is that there's no direct feedback to the endorser, so he or she would have no sense of the relative importance of their endorsement to keeping the discussions rolling along. With visions of the Stack Overflow police, how high a bar should a comment have to pass?

I can only surmise they endorse me because once you give an endorsement you're encouraged to endorse the endorser right back, and maybe they're hoping for endorsement. In short, since I get unqualified endorsements from others, I don't put any stock in endorsements that others have.

Owncloud is great, and avoids the moral complexities of contributing to a board that includes at least one endorser of torture and warrantless surveillance.

Now, thanks to the efforts of politicians in democracies of all stripes, not just those in Iran, it has become the principle endorser of divisiveness in the world of ideas. It is being used to give violently divisive ideas an air of legitimacy that they do not deserve.

That agreement has stipulations, such as being revoked if the association could bring disrepute or reputational harm to the endorser. I'm sure none of the companies on that list want their investors calling the IR to ask about whether this event is a material issue for the company.

My guess is that PG started with the threshold being really low, meaning that a single endorsement will actually post the comment and that an endorser needs very little karma to give a good comment. As the karma and endorsements required go up, it will become harder and harder for bad posts to actually become viewable.

To further the endorsing aspect, how about we link the endorser to the endorsee? If the user endorses a comment which gets downvoted or flagged, there should be some negative reinforcement for the endorser. Similarly, if the user endorses a post that then goes on to get lots of upvotes, the endorser should also receive some positive reinforcement.

"In addition, the Guides say, if there’s a connection between an endorser and the marketer that consumers would not expect and it would affect how consumers evaluate the endorsement, that connection should be disclosed. For example, if an ad features an endorser who’s a relative or employee of the marketer, the ad is misleading unless the connection is made clear. The same is usually true if the endorser has been paid or given something of value to tout the product.