Disputant used in a sentence

Disputant in a sentence as a noun

The bounds of the disputation are up to the disputants.

" And the government goons often beat up both disputants, for good measure.

It cannot lead to real knowledge even if the disputants happen to arrive at what would be the right answer.

This may be a front for infighting within the Bayes Council, or it may be that the disputants have too much spare time.

Plus their time is limited, so they will tend to pick cases with broader legal consequences that will impact more than the disputants.

There is no such obligation in the US, nor will there ever be.[1] Impartial: Treating all rivals or disputants equally

It could well be that he should have handled the situation by reading both disputants the riot act and breaking up the meeting; we have no evidence beyond his say-so.

Formerly these disputes were settled by physical contact of the disputants, with such simple arguments as the rudimentary logic of the times could supply – the sword, the spear, and so forth.

Reasonable people can disagree, and civility demands providing disputants with the benefit of the doubt, which is institutionalized in the courts.

My original point was to call attention to the inappropriate tone of one of the disputants, not participate in more natural language pedantry on the Internet.

Because people who issue pedantic demands to be taken seriously while simultaneously leading with facile arguments rarely prove to be honest disputants.

If you wonder whether your disputant may be tinfoil hat type, the exploratory questions to verify this conjecture may make your disputant not want to discuss with you any longer, because it's kind of distasteful.

"Grandparent absolutely intends his insult, in proximity to his argument, to undermine his disputant's credibility.

> and yet "lawyers, judges, magistrates and other judicial workers" -- a profession not at all known for agreeablenessI think you are confusing lawyers, etc., with the litigants and other disputants whose conflicts provide them jobs.

I found it interesting that in the post he criticizes previous discussion of lock based concurrency, while not providing anything close to the level of analysis that he apparently requires of his fellow disputant.

Because actually prevailing in court will cost more than $50, whereas prevailing in a legal claim for the award of a binding arbitration is very inexpensive; in reality, most bona fide disputants in arbitration can be expected to simply pay.