desisters

The fact of the matter is that the desisters in this study: 1.

And again, with a mean followup time of over 10 years, most of the people who transitioned 5-15 years later would be counted as persisters, not desisters.

Do you have any actual evidence that a significant portion of desisters in this study transitioned later in life?

They either insist that the criteria used was wrong, or baselessly claim that desisters are repressing a desire to transition.

Yes, the desisters in the study would most likely be prescribed blockers if they went to a gender clinic that prioritized affirmation.

As per the linked study, the desisters tend to no longer experience gender dysphoria.

Apostates do not hang around religious conversion forums talking about deconversion, gender transition desisters are not welcome on transgender support forums etc.

She shared a copy of it with me as well — it contains 17 alleged detransitioners or desisters and 60 allegedly worrisome cases.

As I said, the claim that a sizeable chunk of desisters transition later in life is being made without evidence.

I used to be one of these desisters who was bullied out of thinking about transitioning.

Worse, the study could not locate 45.3 percent of the children for follow up, and made the assumption that all of them were desisters.

> with a mean followup time of over 10 years, most of the people who transitioned 5-15 years later would be counted as persisters, not desisters.

I'm not talking about "desisters," people who socially transitioned but never took medical action.

Desisters are not "still in the closet".

If all you're going to do is continue to erroneously claim that the patients in this study weren't expressing a cross sex gender identity ("consider themselves trans"), or baselessly claim that the desisters are actually just repressing a trans identity then there's no value in continuing this.