deodorants

Instead, they suggest that paying attention to deodorant use makes sense even though deodorants are completely useless.

People wear all sorts of oils and perfumes and deodorants that should be washed off before swimming.

You could probably just target the worst 1% and basically go back to deodorants not being locked away behind glass.

Implementing this to sort through things like deodorants and skin flakes is way more complex.

As an anecdote I gave up antiperspirant and deodorants after suffering rashes and pain in my under arms.

Not a fan of deodorants but, biologically, they may not be completely useless: 1.

But, like toothpastes, deodorants, or soaps, there are a TON of options that get piled on by marketers.

For example, many deodorants use both male and female models to promote their products.

My usage of those goes way back, regular deodorants gave me allergic reactions.

Neither of those points suggests that deodorants, in themselves, are anything but useless.

Additionally I discovered that the stains in the underarms of my clothing went away, apparently it's caused by the deodorants.

Regular deodorants don't have aluminum zirconium in them, and in the U.

S regulations) deodorants that do have aluminum in them must declare it as an "active ingredient".

Aluminum-based antiperspirants, commonly called "deodorants" as a misnomer, do no such thing.

I don't think that either smell nor "non-water compounds" are reasons to regulate e-cigarettes tighter than we regulate perfumes, colognes, or spray deodorants.

The side effect of doing this is that I am far more sensitive to perfumes and deodorants people use, and they just aren't at all pleasant in the quantities people feel they need to use to smell "nice".