defendable

That doesn't mean the trademark is defendable, even if it does manage to get past the hurdle of being granted.

The value is in the community, but community is amorphous and not really ownable or defendable.

If the companies are not able to create a network effect, much of their valuation is not defendable.

If it results in better outcomes is of course debatable, but it has a long and defendable track record.

A company with very thin margins, no defendable IP, and very little barrier to entry for competitors.

Which has to be the case because consensuses are literally never defendable with technical arguments or the argument would have sufficed.

Had he been doing that, he'd probably have had a more defendable case.

Anything more, will be kind of like defending a basically not defendable position.

Uber the business doesn't seem to be wildly profitable, or at least not in a defendable way (based partly on data Uber provided).

Personally, I do not think that people buying themselves favorable laws should be legal and defendable.

It's true that they have little defendable IP or innovative products.

IMO the gold trade was defendable, given the geopolitical situation for Switzerland during the height of the the Third Reich - it was completely surrounded.

The most he seems to admit to is "Stats hasn't been awake, hasn't been present", like it's some kind of defendable excuse.

Back in my Rails days I'd say "typing is a very narrow form of automated testing", which given my exposure to C++/Java was defendable opinion.

Also, your thesis is clearly "nothing matters about the future other than human-level AI." This is a defendable thesis, but you can't use this as a starting assumption without confusing your users immensely.