couriers

There's not a huge heap of difference between Instacart and bike couriers (except they provide slightly different services), and while couriers are a very useful service they're really not infrastructure.

There is a stream of liveried delivery vans along my road every day, many more than all couriers combined.

The consequence is that officials don't use email, and either go through couriers, use some grey area communications mechanism, or do something else that is lost to the public record.

In most places, the fancy technology has zero advantage over employing a handful of couriers.

We have couriers (handle pickups), satellite van drivers (take items to warehouse) and those in the warehouse (handle packing and shipping, etc.).

You're getting a letter from your bank that's sent through Lenovo Couriers Ltd (or any other courier service) that's sealed and private.

When I hand it over to the couriers they have custody of it - but they don't own it.

But if I request a pickup from Shyp and the pick up driver's bad, I can change couriers tomorrow.

Likewise, this can be used to work seamlessly with third-party executors like couriers.

Maybe there will be in person couriers for all important communication now.

If I order a parcel from Amazon and my delivery driver's bad, it's unlikely I could get Amazon to change couriers.

Our revolutionary urban logistics and on-demand delivery platform connects customers with local couriers, who purchase and deliver goods from any restaurant or store in a city.

I've seen a few comments here using the example of "I see cycle couriers doing X, therefore cyclists are at fault".

How about something like "Shyp Transitions Couriers to W2 Employees"?